Research

An audit of complications of complex operative gynaecological laparoscopy at a tertiary healthcare facility in South Africa

C N Omile, S Ramphal, J Moodley

Abstract


Background. Operative laparoscopic surgery has many advantages over traditional/open laparotomy. However, it is also associated with complications particularly when performed for complex gynaecological procedures. There are very few reports on operative laparoscopic surgery from developing countries.

Objective. To evaluate the intra- and postoperative complications associated with laparoscopic surgery performed for complex gynaecological conditions by a single surgeon at a tertiary institution.

Method. This was a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent complex laparoscopic surgery between 2004 and 2016.

Results. We retrieved 446 patient records. Surgery for extensive endometriosis (29.8%) and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (29.8%) were the most common procedures. Less than a tenth of patients (4.3%; n=19) had complications, 9 had minor injuries (4 inferior epigastric vessel injury, 1 peritoneal vessel injury, 1 omental vessel injury, 1 surface tissue bleeding and 2 cases of postoperative ileus) and 10 had major injuries (6 intestinal, 2 ureteric and 3 bladder). More than a quarter of complications (26.3%; n=5) occurred at the time of abdominal entry, 63.2% (n=12) occured intraoperatively and 10.5% (n=2) occurred postoperatively. All entry injuries were vascular. Intestinal injury was the most common intraoperative complication.

Conclusion. Despite the many advantages of laparoscopic surgery, complications occur particularly in patients with complex gynaecological pathology.


Authors' affiliations

C N Omile, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Medicine, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

S Ramphal, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Medicine, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

J Moodley, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Medicine, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

Full Text

PDF (168KB)

Cite this article

South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2020;26(3):115-120. DOI:10.7196/sajog.1640

Article History

Date submitted: 2021-11-04
Date published: 2021-11-04

Article Views

Abstract views: 279208
Full text views: 1205

Comments on this article

*Read our policy for posting comments here


The South African Medical Association is the official publisher of the SAJOG.

                                                           

                                        SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

                                                         Events | Careers | CPD

 

The South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology| Online ISSN: 2305-8862 | Print ISSN: 0038-2329 | 

Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 4.0) | 

This journal is protected by a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 4.0) | Read our privacy policy.

SAMA Journals: South African Medical Journal African Journal of Health Professions Education South African Journal of Bioethics and Law South African Journal of Child Health | Southern African Journal of Critical Care  | South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | Undergraduate Research in Health African Journal of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine  | Southern African Journal of Public Health