Research

Attitudes towards and knowledge about intrauterine contraceptive devices among women in the reproductive age group in a resource-constrained setting

Pierre Monji Builu, Thinagrin Dhasarathun Naidoo

Abstract


Background. One of the strategies to reduce maternal mortality includes accessible and appropriate contraceptive services to all women. The intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) has been identified as a cheap and effective means of contraception by the South African National Department of Health.

Objective. To explore knowledge about the IUCD among women using the public health sector and identify any misconceptions.

Methods. A sample of 150 women attending antenatal/postnatal clinics were interviewed using a structured questionnaire.

Results. Forty-six percent (n=69) had some experience with the injectable form of contraception, and 2.7% (n=4) had used the IUCD; 70.7% (n=106) knew that the device does not prevent HIV transmission, 40.7% (n=61) knew that HIV-positive women can use the IUCD, 75.3% (n=113) believed that the IUCD causes heavy bleeding, 36.7% (n=55) knew that the device does not stop fertility indefinitely, 33.3% (n=50) knew that the IUCD can be inserted in the immediate postpartum period, and 26.7% (n=40) knew that the duration of use is 10 years. In terms of attitudes, 40.0% (n=60) expressed concern about the pain during insertion, 33.3% (n=50) believed the IUCD can cause cancer, and 32.0% (n=48) believed that the device interferes with normal sexual activities. Most participants 77.3% (n=116) acquired the information they had about the IUCD from the clinic during teaching and counselling sessions.

Conclusion. This survey documented poor knowledge about the IUCD among women using the public health sector. However, the fact that there are few misconceptions and that clients rely on the clinic information should be seen as an opportunity to improve the situation. 


Authors' affiliations

Pierre Monji Builu, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Grey’s Hospital, Pietermaritzburg, and Nelson Mandela School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

Thinagrin Dhasarathun Naidoo, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Grey’s Hospital, Pietermaritzburg, and Nelson Mandela School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

Full Text

PDF (639KB)

Keywords

Family planning; Intrauterine contraceptive device

Cite this article

South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2015;21(2):27-32. DOI:10.7196/sajog.950

Article History

Date submitted: 2014-11-24
Date published: 2015-12-15

Article Views

Abstract views: 6509
Full text views: 2321

Comments on this article

*Read our policy for posting comments here


The South African Medical Association is the official publisher of the SAJOG.

                                                           

                                        SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

                                                         Events | Careers | CPD

 

The South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology| Online ISSN: 2305-8862 | Print ISSN: 0038-2329 | 

Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 4.0) | 

This journal is protected by a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 4.0) | Read our privacy policy.

SAMA Journals: South African Medical Journal African Journal of Health Professions Education South African Journal of Bioethics and Law South African Journal of Child Health | Southern African Journal of Critical Care  | South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | Undergraduate Research in Health African Journal of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine  | Southern African Journal of Public Health