Research

Induction of labour at a regional hospital in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

B Malende, J Moodley, S R Kambaran

Abstract


Background. Clinicians working in maternity units must recognise the risks associated with induction of labour (IOL. They need to analyse the indications for IOL, methods used and outcomes on a regular basis to reduce complications.

Objective. To determine the indications for IOL and outcomes of current methods at a regional hospital in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Methods. Clinical data for all patients who had IOL over an 8-month period were collected and analysed.

Results. There were 6 649 deliveries, and of these patients 532 had IOL (induction rate 8.0%); 502 patient files had complete information for analysis. The main indications for IOL were hypertensive disorders (43.6%, n=219), post-dates pregnancy (25.9%, n=130) and pre-labour rupture of the membranes (14.7%, n=74). Other indications accounted for 15.7% of cases (n=79). The most common methods of IOL were oral misoprostol (63.5%, n=319) and vaginal misoprostol (30.3%, n=152). Vaginal deliveries were achieved in 59.8% of patients (n=300), and 40.2% (202) had caesarean sections (CSs); 69.7% of patients (n=350) delivered within 24 hours (this includes CSs and vaginal deliveries). Normal vaginal births within 24 hours accounted for 44.4% of total deliveries (n=223), and CSs within 24 hours for 24.3% (n=122). There were 34 babies (6.8%) admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. Prematurity accounted for 10 of these admissions (2.0% of all babies), hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy for 9 (1.8%), and congenital pneumonia for 7 (1.4%). There was 1 early neonatal death.

Conclusion. Current methods of IOL at the rural study site are associated with outcomes similar to those in a report from an urban regional hospital in South Africa.


Authors' affiliations

B Malende, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lower Umfolozi District War Memorial Hospital, Empangeni, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, and Women’s Health and HIV Research Group, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

J Moodley, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lower Umfolozi District War Memorial Hospital, Empangeni, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, and Women’s Health and HIV Research Group, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

S R Kambaran, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lower Umfolozi District War Memorial Hospital, Empangeni, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, and Women’s Health and HIV Research Group, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

Full Text

PDF (613KB)

Keywords

Pregnancy; Induction of labour; Maternal and fetal outcomes; Rural hospital

Cite this article

South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2014;20(1):22-26. DOI:10.7196/sajog.675

Article History

Date submitted: 2013-01-31
Date published: 2014-04-03

Article Views

Abstract views: 5326
Full text views: 1614

Comments on this article

*Read our policy for posting comments here


The South African Medical Association is the official publisher of the SAJOG.

                                                           

                                        SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

                                                         Events | Careers | CPD

 

The South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology| Online ISSN: 2305-8862 | Print ISSN: 0038-2329 | 

Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 4.0) | 

This journal is protected by a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 4.0) | Read our privacy policy.

SAMA Journals: South African Medical Journal African Journal of Health Professions Education South African Journal of Bioethics and Law South African Journal of Child Health | Southern African Journal of Critical Care  | South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | Undergraduate Research in Health African Journal of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine  | Southern African Journal of Public Health