Caesarean section wound infiltration with ropivacaine versus placebo: Survey of chronic pelvic pain after 4 years’ follow-up
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
2 Effective Care Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
3 Fort Hare/Eastern Cape Department of Health, South Africa
4 Easydat Consulting and Projects, Nelspruit, Mpumalanga, South Africa
Objective. To test the hypothesis that optimal management of postoperative pain may reduce the risk of developing chronic pelvic pain in women who undergo caesarean section.
Methods. In a randomised trial in 2006/2007, ropivacaine was infiltrated through all the layers of the anterior abdominal wound in patients undergoing caesarean section. The outcome was a reduction in severe pain or the need for rescue narcotic analgesia within 1 hour after the operation in the ropivacaine group compared with a placebo group (relative risk 0.51; 95% confidence interval 0.38 - 0.69). A follow-up study 4 years later was designed to assess the prevalence of chronic pelvic pain by carrying out telephonic interviews with these women, of whom 77 were contactable and 75 were analysed. Data and statistical analysis were done using Microsoft Excel (2007), Epi Info (version 343) statistical and Review Manager 5 software.
Results. Three out of 40 women in the ropivacaine group and 3/35 in the placebo group had persistent pelvic pain (total rate of chronic pelvic pain 8.1%).
Conclusion. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of chronic pelvic pain between the ropivacaine wound infiltration group (7.5%) and the placebo group (8.6%) after 4 years’ follow-up.
S Afr J OG 2013;19(3):75-76. DOI:10.7196/SAJOG.623
Ten to fifty per cent of patients who have surgical procedures may develop chronic pain, which can be severe in 2 - 10% of those afflicted.1 Chronic pain can be defined as prolonged pain persisting for longer than the expected period of healing following an injury.2 Caesarean section is a common major obstetric procedure, with the possible complication of chronic postoperative pelvic pain3 as a result of adhesion formation, adenomyosis, and injury to nerves and blood vessels.4
Acute postoperative pain is a recognised risk factor for the development of chronic pain.5 Specifically, suboptimally managed acute pain during the immediate postoperative period is a risk factor in the development of chronic pelvic pain after ceasarean section. One of the principles of the prevention of chronic pain is optimal management of acute pain.6
The pathophysiology of chronic pain following suboptimally managed acute injury is persistent stimulation of C fibres in the peripheral nerves, which gradually build up electrical responses in the central nervous system – i.e. it is a non-nocioceptive pain. 7 In this study, we followed up a randomised controlled trial in which wound infiltration with a local anaesthetic had been used to manage acute postoperative pain, with the aim of determining the incidence of chronic pelvic pain. In the index study, 50/100 women undergoing elective caesarean section at term under general anaesthesia received infiltration of ropivacaine into all layers of the wound including the peritoneum, and 50 received a saline placebo. Further analgesia was administered as demanded. Twenty-four of the patients who received the local anaesthetic and 47 of those given the placebo experienced severe pain or required a rescue narcotic analgesic within 1 hour after the operation (relative risk 0.51; 95% confidence interval 0.38 - 0.69).8 The hypothesis tested in the follow-up study was whether the significant acute pain relief obtained with ropivacaine local analgesia translated into a reduction in the risk of chronic pelvic pain after 4 - 5 years of follow-up.
Women who took part in the index study in 2006/20078 were followed up in 2011; 77/100 could be traced. They were contacted telephonically and interviewed in both the indigenous isiSwati/isiZulu and English languages. They were asked their age, parity and level of education, about their general satisfaction with the index surgery, if they had had any other operation after the caesarean section, and whether they had experienced any non-cyclical pelvic pain lasting for 3 or more months. If they had experienced such pain, they were asked to describe it and indicate its severity. Women who had had repeat caesarean sections were asked to relate their experience of the trial caesarean section. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel (2007), Epi-Info (version 343) statistical and Review Manager 5 software. The Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, granted institutional approval of the study in February 2011.
Of the 100
women sought, 77 were traceable. All who were traced agreed to
be interviewed. The mean follow-up time was 4.4 years
(standard deviation ±0.28; range 4
- 5). Two women (one in each group) had a previous history of
persistent pelvic pain for which they had undergone
laparoscopic surgical intervention before the index caesarean
section, and were therefore excluded from analysis (Fig. 1).
Seventy-three (97.3%) of the remaining 75 women had grade 12
or higher education (all women who participated in the index
trial had medical insurance cover). The baseline demographic
characteristics in the ropivacaine and placebo (control) arms
of the study were similar (Table 1). Three of the 40 women in
the ropivacaine group and 5/35 in the control group had had a
repeat caesarean section after the index caesarean section.
Three women in the ropivacaine group (7.5%) and 3 in the
control group (8.6%) had persistent pelvic pain (total rate of
chronic pelvic pain 8.0%) (Table 2). Four of these 6 women
reported that their pain was worse during winter or when it
was cold, 3 described the pain as stabbing, and one each
described the pain as pulling, crampy or burning. All took
analgesics intermittently, but none had undergone
laparoscopic surgery or hysterectomy for the pain. However,
one woman said that she would not mind having surgical
intervention to manage her pain.
None of the 6 women with chronic pelvic pain regretted that their babies had been delivered by caesarean section. Eight of the 75 (10.7%) would have preferred to deliver vaginally (Table 2) if they had not been advised to have a caesarean section to protect their baby as part of the mother-to-child transmission of HIV prevention programme. None of these 8 women had chronic pelvic pain. One woman had had symptoms of postpartum depression, but had not sought medical intervention. All were satisfied with the levels of pain control and care that they had received after their caesarean section.
A systematic review of 122 studies found an association between caesarean section and chronic, non-cyclical pelvic pain, but not dysmenorrhoea or dyspareunia.9 However, such associations could be due to confounding factors, and do not confirm causality. For example, women with pelvic conditions predisposing to chronic pelvic pain may be more likely to undergo caesarean section. Probably the only randomised trial with the potential to demonstrate an effect of caesarean section on chronic pelvic pain is the Term Breech Trial.10 In a 2-year follow-up, maternal outcomes were compared between women in the planned caesarean section group (of whom 89% had caesarean sections) and the planned vaginal birth group (of whom 44% had caesarean sections). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with respect to dyspareunia (9/457 v. 6/460), pain deep in the abdomen (23/457 v. 27/460) or overall pain (38/457 v. 42/460).
The risk of developing chronic pelvic pain after caesarean section is variable. The rate of 8.1% in this study is within the range of figures quoted in previous studies.2 , 5 , 9 , 10 The current study appears to be the longest follow-up assessing the risk of chronic pelvic pain in women who have undergone caesarean section, following a randomised trial. The prevalence of non-cyclical, persistent pelvic pain that lasted 3 months or more was the same in both arms of the study. A reason for failure to detect a difference in outcome may be that women in both arms of the earlier study received optimal pain control when they expressed the need for analgesics after the index caesarean section. The index trial was not designed to assess chronic pelvic pain, and this accounts for the inadequate sample size that may have prevented detection of a difference between the two populations. The results of the present study should therefore not be regarded as conclusive.
After a mean of 4.4 years, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of chronic pelvic pain between women who had received ropivacaine wound infiltration for pain control after caesarean section v. those who had received placebo.
Acknowledgement. A A Bamigboye Incorporated,
Sandton, South Africa, for sponsoring the study.
1. Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet 2006;367(9522):1618-1625. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X]
2. Grichnik KP, Ferrante FM. The difference between acute and chronic pain. Mt Sinai J Med 1991;58(3):217-220.
3. Nikolajsen L, Sørensen HC, Jensen TS, et al. Chronic pain following caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004;48(1):111-116. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00271]
4. Almeida EC, Nogueira AA, Candido dos Reis FJ, et al. Caesarean section as a cause of chronic pelvic pain. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002;79(2):101-104. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(02)00227-8]
5. Nikolajsen L, Minella CE. Acute postoperative pain as a risk factor for chronic pain. Eur J Pain 2009;3(2):29-32. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eujps.2009.07.011]
6. Sng BL, Sia AT, Quek K, et al. Incidence and risk factors for chronic pain after caesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009;37(5):748-752.
7. Melzack R, Wall P. Pain mechanism: A new theory. Science 1965;150(699):971-979.
8. Bamigboye AA, Hofmeyr GJ. Ropivacaine abdominal wound infiltration and peritoneal spraying at cesarean delivery for preemptive analgesia. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2008;102(2):160-164. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.03.019]
9. Latthe P, Mignini L, Gray R, et al. Factors predisposing women to chronic pelvic pain: Systematic review. BMJ 2006;332(7544):749-755. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38748.697465.55]
10. Hannah ME, Whyte H, Hannah WJ, et al. Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: The International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191(3):917-927. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.08.004]
Full text views: 3787