Research

Late termination of pregnancy for congenital anomalies: a tertiary care center experience in South Africa.

Fauzia Shahid, Priya Soma-Pillay

Abstract


BACKGROUND

Most lethal and non-lethal congenital anomalies can be diagnosed early in pregnancy and this can help prevent neonatal morbidity and mortality by appropriate antenatal management. Termination of pregnancy for severe congenital anomalies is permitted under South African law. Early termination is associated with less medical and psychological complications.

METHODS

Medical records of 57 women who had opted for late termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies over a period of 10 years were analyzed. Women’s demographics, interval from referral to feticide, gestational age at first scan and diagnosis, type of anomaly, methods and agents used for feticide were assessed.

RESULTS

Forty five (78.9%) of the women were less than 35 years old, 40 (70%) had no chronic medical conditions or risk factors. Thirty women (52.6%) had booked early in their pregnancy but only3 (5.2%) had a first trimester scan. Forty two (73.7%) had a clinically indicated third trimester scan and a late diagnosis. Mean time to referral between late (LTOP) and very late termination (VLTOP) groups was not significantly different 8 (1 – 41) and 6.5 (1 – 70) p value 0.671 for the two groups respectively. In 35 (62%) of the women potassium chloride was used for feticide. No procedure related complications were noted.

CONCLUSION

All pregnant women should have a basic ultrasound in second trimester. Task shifting should be used to provide this facility in primary and secondary health centers. A national registry should be established to document all late terminations for fetal anomalies.


Authors' affiliations

Fauzia Shahid, University of Pretoria

Priya Soma-Pillay, University of Pretoria

Full Text

PDF (173KB)

Keywords

Congenital anomalies; Feticide; Potassium chloride; Late termination of pregnancy; Holoprosencephaly

Cite this article

South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2019;25(2):. DOI:10.7196/sajog.1402

Article History

Date submitted: 2018-10-19
Date published: 2019-10-28

Article Views

Abstract views: 80
Full text views: 37

Comments on this article

*Read our policy for posting comments here